Login
English

Select your language

English
Français
Deutsch
Platform
SOLUTIONS
Experimentation
Feature Management
add-ons & KEY Features
Mobile App Testing
Recommendations & Search
Personalization
Single Page Applications
integrate to your stack
Specialities
for all teams
Marketing
Product
Engineering
For INDUSTRIES
Healthcare
Financial Services
E-commerce
Automotive
Travel & Tourism
Media & Entertainment
B2B

Optimize digital experiences by chatting with AI and win up to $100,000

join the contest
PlansCustomersResources
Book a demo
Book a demo

What is vibe experimentation?

Quick links

Heading 2
Book a demo
Book a demo

What is vibe experimentation?

Vibe experimentation is a new way to ideate, create, configure, and analyze experiments using natural language. When you run a vibe experiment, you are creating production-grade, experiment-ready UI variations using generative AI tools that are integrated with your product’s design system and code base.

The practice takes its name from "vibe coding." Vibe coding is using natural language to build, refine, and debug code, allowing users to build prototypes, websites, and even functioning apps from scratch.

The main difference is that vibe experimentation builds inside your website or app, removing the need to transfer, refine, and integrate builds into your site before you can run a test on them.

Instead of a visual editor (WYSIWYG) or writing custom code, teams describe what they want to test, who it's for, and how success should be measured.

The result is a real experiment: targeted, measurable, and statistically structured, built from a single prompt.

In terms of creation, vibe experimentation does everything that a WYSIWYG can and much more.

It handles complex layout changes, new element creation, and brand-aligned features that are often impossible with legacy tools.

It allows users to optimize existing websites, unlike “vibe coding” or “vibe design,” which only allows for creating new web products.

With vibe experimentation, teams can:

  • Add dynamic “add to cart” buttons within product listings that follow your site’s fonts and brand guidelines.
  • Implement sticky headers or call-to-action bars that remain consistent with your design system.
  • Introduce personalized pop-ups and tooltips triggered by user behavior that maintain brand typography and color schemes.
  • Replace pagination with infinite scroll on category pages, ensuring the experience works across modern frontend frameworks.
  • Generate quizzes, forms, pop-ups, banners, and surveys that stoke and accelerate the customer journey.

Vibe testing also creates experiments compatible with most single-page applications (SPAs), as the AI automatically detects the underlying framework and handles edge cases that traditional graphic editors often struggle with.

How does vibe experimentation work?

Kameleoon allows users to run vibe experiments via our Prompt-Based Experimentation tool.

It starts with a free browser extension that takes seconds to install.

The extension enables users to add the testing tool and its AI locally into their browser.

With the extension enabled, users launch the testing tool and start prompting the AI to optimize any web page.

While optimizing any web page in your browser using the extension is a powerful feature, for the web page to be tested (and it should) the testing tool’s script must be installed on the user’s website.

With a snippet installed, users describe what they want to test in natural language. The system creates a real experiment: it builds the experience, configures targeting, allocates traffic, and tracks KPIs.

Before launch, teams can simulate the test and adjust details if needed.

The vibe experimentation tool handles the heavy lifting of optimizing the web product and building the test. Teams can move faster while keeping the rigor that makes experimentation valuable.

What problems does vibe experimentation solve?

Most legacy web experimentation tools rely on visual editors that haven’t aged well. They were built for a simpler web. But visual editing doesn't scale; it breaks with SPAs, dynamic content, and custom frameworks.

Instead of solving the underlying problems, many testing platforms have added AI features that fail to address the root issues. That AI, however, is shallow: "Rewrite this headline," "Enhance your CTA tone," "Generate an image." It's cosmetic, designed to look helpful while avoiding the hard problems of experimentation.

Vibe experimentation isn’t cosmetic. Instead of fighting with a visual editor or calling up for dev resources, teams can build better web products using tools like Prompt-Based Experimentation.

Users describe the change by chatting with generative AI (genAI). Once done, they specify the targeting conditions, the goals/metrics/KPIs, and the test allocation. The system builds the experiment, from creation to targeting to analysis.

Teams go from "we should test this" to "we're testing it" without delays, tickets, or compromises. This approach doesn’t speed up a broken process; it replaces it entirely.

Prompt-Based Experimentation is different than agentic AI experimentation

Prompt-based experimentation and agentic AI experimentation represent two fundamentally different approaches to testing.

Agentic AI experimentation is reactive. It scans your data for anomalies, flags a potential issue—like a dip in conversion—and suggests actions in response. But without human context, those suggestions can be shallow, distracting, or even wrong. The system decides what’s important, and teams are left to validate or ignore it.

Prompt-based testing is proactive. While prompt-based experimentation also supports ideation, it starts with a human decision. A product manager, designer, or marketer chooses what to explore. They describe what they want to change or test, and the system builds it. There’s no guessing about goals or hallucinating causes. It’s a controlled, clear process from insight to action.

Prompt-based testing starts from intent. Agentic systems work backwards from anomalies.

That distinction matters more as GenAI gets faster and more accessible. When creation is easy, it’s tempting to hand the wheel to automation. But experiments still need human context, data discipline, and business alignment. Prompt-based testing keeps the team in control, making it easier to move fast without losing focus.

Vibe experimentation supports every kind of experiment, including personalization

Experimentation is not one-size-fits-all. It adapts to what you want to learn or improve. With vibe experimentation, teams build and target experiences by describing them in natural language. Just say who should see what, and what to measure.

Vibe experimentation enables prompt personalization. You create and target in the same step. No toggling between tools. No manual setup. Just describe your intent and launch.

For example, Kameleoon's Prompt-Based Experimentation allows you to say:

  • Show this experience to all mobile users
  • Show only to returning visitors
  • Target users who have not completed checkout
  • Deliver to new visitors only
  • Display to users in California

Vibe experimentation allows for different experimentation goals. Here are a few prompt examples:

Guardrails matter more when anyone can test anything

Vibe experimentation opens the door wide. Anyone can build. Anyone can launch. Anyone can test. That is both the breakthrough and the risk.

Without structure, teams could flood users with unproven experiences. Without rigor, they could draw the wrong conclusions from noisy data. This is why guardrails aren’t optional; they are essential.

  • Clear KPIs tied to business outcomes
  • Valid targeting and traffic splits with no sample ratio mismatch
  • Appropriate levels of statistical rigor
  • Multiple types of statistical methodology, not one
  • Connected insights across systems

Vibe experimentation doesn’t limit what is possible. It ensures what is possible actually works. As test creation becomes easier, experimentation discipline becomes more important.

Freedom to test must come with the responsibility to learn.

Vibe experimentation connects to your stack, not just your UI

Building a new digital experience isn’t a test. It’s just the first step.

Prompt-based experimentation lets teams build experiences and test them with targeting, traffic allocation, and rigorous measurement.

To do that well, teams need to connect to their data sources, analytics tools, and insights libraries.

Vibe experimentation makes that possible.

  • "Target audiences from our Snowflake warehouse."
  • "Send results to FullStory and Snowplow."
  • "Log insights to Airtable."

It’s not just about building. It’s about learning what works.

Vibe experimentation gives teams the power to test experiences in the context of their real data and analytics.

No manual integrations. No disconnected tools.

Just experiments that fit the way your team actually works.

How vibe experimentation empowers your teams

Vibe experimentation helps teams build better websites and web products by turning ideas into real, testable experiences fast.

Marketers, product managers, growth teams, and developers can create experiments through natural language, without waiting on handoffs or writing code. Here’s what that looks like for each team.

Prompts for marketers

  • “Create a discount banner for cart abandoners on mobile. Match brand styling. Track click-through and conversions.”
  • “Build a location-specific popup for California visitors promoting free shipping. Hold out 15% of traffic. Track bounce and engagement.”
  • “Launch a newsletter signup form at blog scroll depth of 75%. Style it with brand fonts and CTA colors. Track sign-up rate.”

Prompts for product managers

  • “Deploy a multi-step quiz to onboard freemium users. Use company design system. Track drop-off and trial-to-paid conversions.”
  • “Add a dynamic survey on pricing comprehension. Trigger after plan selection. Track feedback and plan changes."
  • “Build a floating help widget explaining new features. Target logged-in users only. Measure feature usage before and after.”

Prompts for growth teams

  • “Design and test a promotional banner for users with over $50 in cart. Match product category visuals. Track AOV and checkout rate.”
  • “Build a popup quiz recommending products based on preferences. Target return visitors. Track quiz completions and product clicks.”
  • “Generate an exit-intent survey on the category page. Ask about shopping experience. Track completions and impact on return visits.”

Prompt-based experiments for front-end developers

  • “Generate a sticky header bar showing active promos. Use system styles. Track user engagement and dismissals.”
  • “Build a mobile-only feedback form for cart page. Place it after inactivity. Track submissions and satisfaction ratings.”
  • “Create an animated tooltip for new features in the nav bar. Show on hover. Track hover time and clicks.”

Vibe experimentation is a fast-moving space

Vibe experimentation is growing and changing rapidly.

It relies on GenAI models that are evolving quickly, making prompt-based testing better and more complete every day.

Teams today are under pressure to move quickly. They need to experiment and learn on the fly.

They have tools that help them dream up ideas, tools that help them build pages, and tools that help them analyze results.

But those tools live in silos.

They let teams build, but they don’t let them test in a structured, disciplined way.

A good idea becomes a change, and that change gets launched, often without targeting, without traffic splits, and without KPIs.

It’s not an experiment. It’s just a guess in production.

Vibe experimentation changes that.

It’s not just about helping teams build. It’s about helping them build tests that matter, using real audiences, real metrics, and real structure.

It’s already changing the way teams ideate, create, and analyze. And soon, it will guide them through the entire test configuration process:

  • Who to target
  • How to split traffic
  • Which KPIs to track
  • Where to send the results

No more guesswork. No more hoping something worked.

Start your free trial for Prompt-Based Experimentation

Begin running your own vibe experiments with a free trial for Prompt-Based Experimentation by Kameleoon. Try it on your own site. Build experiments by chatting with AI. Explore a new way to interact with an experimentation platform.

Vibe experimentation FAQ

How do different teams use A/B testing?

A/B testing is an incredibly versatile method for generating insights. It can be valuable to many teams, including marketing, product, and growth teams. Marketing teams can construct A/B tests to reveal which campaigns lead customers down their funnel effectively. Product teams can test user retention and engagement. Growth teams can easily use them to evaluate different components of their customer journey.

How do you select the right A/B testing solution for your organization?

It all comes down to the technical skill levels of your experimentation team members. So first, poll team members to determine their front and back-end development skills. Then, think about the test complexity and test volume you want to produce.Just some of the essential features of an A/B testing platform you’ll want to look to include:Graphical editor for codeless test-buildingCustomizable user segmentation toolsBuilt-in widget librarySimulation tool to evaluate test parametersComparative analysis toolsReport sharingDecision support systems Do you have the skills available to carry out all of those tests? The higher the volume and greater the complexity of tests you want to conduct, the more likely you will benefit from using a testing solution like Kameleoon Hybrid.

How does A/B testing help different teams in my organization?

An A/B test presents multiple versions of a webpage or an app to users to determine which version leads to more positive outcomes. This is a relatively easy way to improve user engagement, offer more engaging content, reduce bounce rates, and improve conversion rates.Every time you conduct an A/B test, you learn more about how your customers engage with your site or app. Over time, a comprehensive testing program creates a feedback loop making your content more and more effective and providing a foundation for new, even more insightful tests.

How does an A/B test work?

Usually, you’re testing two versions: your original version, the A version—also called the control—against the modified B version you hypothesize will perform better. Before building your A/B test, you decide what metrics to measure so you can quantify what “better” means in your test results.

Is A/B testing qualitative or quantitative?

A/B testing is quantitative. The experimentation method involves comparing numerical data from two versions of click-through rates or conversion rates, to see which one performs better. This method uses statistics to enable data-backed decisions

Is A/B testing the same as a controlled experiment?

A/B testing is a type of controlled experiment; with A/B testing, you create two (or more) versions of a variable and randomly assign users to each version to control external factors. This way, any differences in outcomes can be attributed to the changes you made, making it a controlled and reliable method for testing.

What A/B testing techniques can you use?

A/B testing can be as simple or as complex as you want. For example, you can conduct simple version tests where you compare the effectiveness of a new B version against an original A version. You can also conduct multivariate tests (MVT) where you compare the effectiveness of different combinations of changes. You could also test three or more variations simultaneously, called A/B/n testing. If you can change your codebase that modifies your user experience, there is a way to test it.

What is the difference between A/B testing and split testing?

A/B testing and split testing are often used interchangeably, but they can have slightly different meanings.A/B testing typically involves comparing two versions (A and B) of a single element to see which one performs better. Split testing, on the other hand, can involve comparing multiple versions of multiple elements at once. So, while all A/B tests are split tests, not all split tests are A/B tests.

What is the difference between an A/B test and a hypothesis test?

A/B testing is a specific type of hypothesis testing where you compare two versions of something to see which one performs better. Hypothesis testing is a broader concept used in statistics to determine if there is enough evidence to support a specific hypothesis.For example, your hypothesis might be that version B of a webpage will get more clicks than version A. You then run the test to see if the data supports this hypothesis. You can learn more about the differences between A/B testing and hypothesis testing here.

What is the difference between usability testing and A/B testing?

Usability testing focuses on how real users interact with a product to identify any issues or areas for improvement. The objective of this testing method is to understand user behavior and get qualitative feedback.A/B testing, on the other hand, compares two versions of a product, product feature, or web page to see which one performs better based on quantitative data, like conversion rates or click-through rates. In short, usability testing helps make a product easier to use, while A/B testing helps optimize its performance.

What should A/B testing not be used for?

A/B testing should not be used for making major design or strategy changes without prior research. This testing method is best suited for testing small, incremental changes. Additionally, before testing you should always make sure you have sufficient traffic to gather reliable results.

Who uses A/B testing?

A/B testing is used by a wide range of professionals, including marketers, web developers, product managers, product developers, and healthcare providers, and industries, including large ecommerce companies or banks, for example. Anyone looking to optimize their digital content, improve user experience, or make data-driven decisions can benefit from this type of experimentation.

Why do people use A/B testing?

People use A/B testing to compare two versions of a webpage, app feature, or other marketing materials to see which one performs better. This experimentation method helps businesses make data-driven decisions by showing them which version leads to higher engagement, conversions, or other desired outcomes.For example, in healthcare marketing, A/B testing can help determine which call-to-action (CTA) copy gets more patients to book an appointment online, ultimately improving communication and patient engagement. By testing different elements and analyzing the results, organizations can optimize their strategies to better meet their goals.

‍

Experiment your way

Get the key to staying ahead in the world of experimentation.

[Placeholder text - Hubspot will create the error message]
Thanks for submitting the form.

Newsletter

Platform
ExperimentationFeature ManagementPBX Free-TrialMobile App TestingProduct Reco & MerchData AccuracyData Privacy & SecuritySingle Page ApplicationAI PersonalizationIntegrations
guides
A/B testingVibe ExperimentationFeature FlaggingPersonalizationFeature ExperimentationAI for A/B testingClient-Side vs Server-Side
plans
PricingMTU vs MAU
Industries
HealthcareFinancial ServicesE-commerceAutomotiveTravel & TourismMedia & EntertainmentB2B & SaaS
TEAMS
MarketingProductDevelopers
Resources
Customers StoriesAcademyDev DocsUser ManualProduct RoadmapCalculatorWho’s Who
compare us
OptimizelyVWOAB Tasty
partners
Integrations DirectoryPartners Directory
company
About UsCareersContact UsSupport
legal
Terms of use and ServicePrivacy PolicyLegal Notice & CSUPCI DSS
© Kameleoon — 2025 All rights Reserved
Legal Notice & CSUPrivacy policyPCI DSSPlatform Status